Beilstein J. Nanotechnol.2018,9, 1075–1084, doi:10.3762/bjnano.9.99
in the diameter, but almost insensitive to the changes in dot height. This behavior is explained by a detailed sensitivity analysis of different factors affecting the optical transition energy.
Keywords: anharmonic atomistic strain model; biaxialstrainratio; configuration interaction; optical
tensor components that do not match the analytical solution of the strain in quantum wells as shown in Table 1. The parameters of the model have been tuned to reproduce the biaxialstrainratio σ of InAs in order to capture the strain distribution in quantum wells and quantum dots made from InAs. The
biaxialstrainratio σ of InAs is 1.053 [23]. Only the parameter α0 has been tuned to 19.35 Nm−1 while keeping the rest of the strain parameters as reported in [7]. Table 1 shows the atomistic strain calculated for InAs/GaAs quantum well, as shown in Figure 4, before and after tuning. The analytical
PDF
Figure 1:
A schematic of the measured and simulated QD system. The dimensions of the simulated structure are ...